Dixon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dixon v. State

865 S.W.2d 793, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1548, 1993 WL 387193

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 5, 1993·No. No. 63285·Published

Opinion

[794]*794ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion filed after he pleaded guilty as a prior offender and Class X offender to second degree trafficking of drugs. We affirm, finding no clear error in such denial. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

We further find an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided the parties a memorandum for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[794]*794ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion filed after he pleaded guilty as a prior offender and Class X offender to second degree trafficking of drugs. We affirm, finding no clear error in such denial. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

We further find an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided the parties a memorandum for their use only.

Dixon v. State, 865 S.W.2d 793, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1548, 1993 WL 387193 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

865 S.W.2d 793 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.