Dixon v. State
809 S.W.2d 188, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 695, 1991 WL 82563
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dixon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1568 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant’s, Donald Dixon, sole point on appeal is the trial court was clearly erroneous in denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing and finding of facts and conclusions of law. We have reviewed the record and find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dixon v. State, 809 S.W.2d 188, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 695, 1991 WL 82563 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).
809 S.W.2d 188 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.