Dixon v. State
This text of 39 S.E. 846 (Dixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. To render a confession of guilt admissible as evidence it must have been made voluntarily, without being induced by another by the slightest hope of benefit. Hence, any advice to a prisoner under arrest by the officer having her in custody, to the effect that if she knew anything she had better tell it, vitiates a confession induced thereby. Green v. State, 88 Ga. 516.
2. When in the trial of a criminal case it becomes a question whether or not the accused made a confession, a charge assuming that he did so is erroneous. Under such circumstances, the court should, in the proper connection, distinctly instruct the jury to ascertain from the evidence whether a confession has been in fact made.
3. Other than as above indicated, there was at the trial now under review no-material error a repetition of which will probably occur on the next hearing.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 S.E. 846, 113 Ga. 1039, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-state-ga-1901.