Dixon v. Monsanto Company

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedJune 19, 2020
Docket1:20-cv-00137
StatusUnknown

This text of Dixon v. Monsanto Company (Dixon v. Monsanto Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon v. Monsanto Company, (E.D. Mo. 2020).

Opinion

riILCW U.S. DISTRICT COURT GREGORY J. LINHARES)CDERK DISTRICT ARKANSAS A TRUE CORYOREHEORIGINA Jun 19, 2020 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL FASTER S DISK OH □□□□□□ on AOS Zh W. McCORMACK, CLERK MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ON ef — By: Jake Kornegay D.C. DEP CLERK IN RE: DICAMBA HERBICIDES LITIGATION MDL No. 2820

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -14)

On February 1, 2018, the Panel transferred 5 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 289 F.Supp.3d 1345 (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 25 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Eastern District of Missouri. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of Missouri and assigned to Judge Limbaugh. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Eastern District of Missouri for the reasons stated in the order of February 1, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the o_o FOR THE PANEL: cusps orice GL oA John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel

IN RE: DICAMBA HERBICIDES LITIGATION MDL No. 2820

SCHEDULE CTO−14 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

ARKANSAS EASTERN ARE 3 20−00159 Dixon v. Monsanto Company et al

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Dicamba Herbicides Litig.
289 F. Supp. 3d 1345 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dixon v. Monsanto Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-monsanto-company-moed-2020.