Dixon v. Duffy

343 U.S. 393, 72 S. Ct. 859, 96 L. Ed. 2d 1026, 96 L. Ed. 1026, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2099
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 12, 1952
Docket79
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 343 U.S. 393 (Dixon v. Duffy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon v. Duffy, 343 U.S. 393, 72 S. Ct. 859, 96 L. Ed. 2d 1026, 96 L. Ed. 1026, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2099 (1952).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On November 5,1951, we ordered this cause “continued for such period as will enable counsel for petitioner to secure a determination from the Supreme Court of California as to whether the judgment herein was intended to rest on an adequate independent state ground or whether decision of the federal claim was necessary to the judgment rendered.” 342 U. S. 33, 34 (1951).

We have not yet been advised whether the Supreme Court of California has conducted any further proceedings in this case or has so entered as to become a part of the record, any order, opinion or certificate after November 5, 1951. We do not regard a letter, not apparently a part of the case record, received by the Clerk of this Court on March 31, 1952, signed by the Clerk of the Supreme Court of California as a sufficient “determination” of the question raised in our order of November 5, 1951.

*394 Accordingly, the cause is ordered further continued for such period as will enable counsel for petitioner to secure from the Supreme Court of California its official determination as requested in our order of November 5, 1951.

Cause continued.

Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the opinion that the federal question in the case has been fully exposed, dissents. Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dixon v. Duffy
344 U.S. 143 (Supreme Court, 1952)
State Ex Rel. Ketchum v. Marshall
106 N.E.2d 796 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 U.S. 393, 72 S. Ct. 859, 96 L. Ed. 2d 1026, 96 L. Ed. 1026, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-duffy-scotus-1952.