Dixie Pipeline Co. v. Trosclair

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Dixie Pipeline Co. v. Trosclair

227 So. 2d 13, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5914

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 16, 1969

DocketNo. 2765

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 227 So. 2d 13 (Dixie Pipeline Co. v. Trosclair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dixie Pipeline Co. v. Trosclair, 227 So. 2d 13, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5914 (La. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinions

MILLER, Judge.

This expropriation suit by Dixie Pipeline Company versus Amilcar J. Trosclair is a companion to two other similar suits. See Dixie Pipeline Company v. Barry, 227 So.2d 1 (No. 2764 on our docket), and Dixie Pipeline Company v. Broussard, 227 So.2d 13 (No. 2766 on our docket).

For the reasons assigned in Dixie Pipeline Company v. Marguerite Kidder Barry, supra, the judgment appealed from in the instant suit is amended to award additional damages to Amilcar J. Trosclair in the amount of $744.80 as severance damages related to the taking of the 8-inch pipeline servitude. Defendant is entitled to interest at the rate of S’% per annum from December 18, 1968, until paid. The judgment is otherwise affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff-appellee.

Amended and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLER, Judge.

This expropriation suit by Dixie Pipeline Company versus Amilcar J. Trosclair is a companion to two other similar suits. See Dixie Pipeline Company v. Barry, 227 So.2d 1 (No. 2764 on our docket), and Dixie Pipeline Company v. Broussard, 227 So.2d 13 (No. 2766 on our docket).

For the reasons assigned in Dixie Pipeline Company v. Marguerite Kidder Barry, supra, the judgment appealed from in the instant suit is amended to award additional damages to Amilcar J. Trosclair in the amount of $744.80 as severance damages related to the taking of the 8-inch pipeline servitude. Defendant is entitled to interest at the rate of S’% per annum from December 18, 1968, until paid. The judgment is otherwise affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff-appellee.

Amended and affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 So. 2d 13, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixie-pipeline-co-v-trosclair-lactapp-1969.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack