Dixie Concrete Services, Inc. v. Life Insurance Company of Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dixie Concrete Services, Inc. v. Life Insurance Company of Georgia

331 S.E.2d 889, 174 Ga. App. 866, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 1983

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 28, 1985

Docket70065

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 331 S.E.2d 889 (Dixie Concrete Services, Inc. v. Life Insurance Company of Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dixie Concrete Services, Inc. v. Life Insurance Company of Georgia, 331 S.E.2d 889, 174 Ga. App. 866, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 1983 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Dixie Concrete Services, Inc. brought suit to enforce a material-man’s lien against Hardee’s Restaurants, Inc. and Life Insurance Company of Georgia (owners). The trial court granted the owners’ motion for summary judgment on the basis that the lien should be dissolved pursuant to OCGA § 44-14-361.2. Dixie Concrete Services appeals.

The sole question on appeal is whether the language in the affidavit executed by the general contractor for appellees sufficiently complies with the provisions of OCGA § 44-14-361.2 in order to effect a dissolution of appellant’s lien. OCGA § 44-14-361.2 (a) provides: “The special lien specified in [OCGA § 44-14-361 (a)] shall be dissolved if the owner . . . shows that: (2) (A) They or any of them have obtained the sworn written statement of the contractor or person other than the owner at whose instance the labor, services, or materials were furnished, . . . that the agreed price or reasonable value of the labor, services or materials have been paid or waived in writing by the lien claimant; and [a recording matter not in issue here].” The general contractor’s affidavit in the case sub judice stated that the general contractor “has paid in full or has otherwise satisfied all obligations for all materials and equipment furnished” by appellant. Appellant contends that the inclusion in the affidavit of the language “or has otherwise satisfied” appellant’s claims introduced an alternative method of compensation which was not contemplated by the statute and thus the affidavit fails to meet the requirements of OCGA § 44-14-361.2.

We do not agree. The general contractor’s language that he “has paid in full or has otherwise satisfied all obligations” constitutes a sworn statement that appellant was completely compensated for all work and services performed, labor, materials and equipment furnished. “[I]nasmuch as our lien laws and procedures are in derogation of the common law, they must be construed strictly against the creditor and in favor of the debtor. [Cit.]” Brockett Road Apts. v. Ga.Pacific Corp., 138 Ga. App. 198, 199 (225 SE2d 771) (1976). (Emphasis supplied.) See Cowart v. Reeves, 80 Ga. App. 161, 164 (55 SE2d 911) (1949). Construing OCGA § 44-14-361.2 (a) (2) (A) in favor of appellees-debtors, we find the general contractor’s affidavit in substantial if not complete compliance with the statute and affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong, P. J., and Carley, J., concur. *867 Decided May 28, 1985. Lamar Gibson, for appellant. Martin W. Foster, Michael D. Devane, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sognier, Judge.

Dixie Concrete Services, Inc. brought suit to enforce a material-man’s lien against Hardee’s Restaurants, Inc. and Life Insurance Company of Georgia (owners). The trial court granted the owners’ motion for summary judgment on the basis that the lien should be dissolved pursuant to OCGA § 44-14-361.2. Dixie Concrete Services appeals.

The sole question on appeal is whether the language in the affidavit executed by the general contractor for appellees sufficiently complies with the provisions of OCGA § 44-14-361.2 in order to effect a dissolution of appellant’s lien. OCGA § 44-14-361.2 (a) provides: “The special lien specified in [OCGA § 44-14-361 (a)] shall be dissolved if the owner . . . shows that: (2) (A) They or any of them have obtained the sworn written statement of the contractor or person other than the owner at whose instance the labor, services, or materials were furnished, . . . that the agreed price or reasonable value of the labor, services or materials have been paid or waived in writing by the lien claimant; and [a recording matter not in issue here].” The general contractor’s affidavit in the case sub judice stated that the general contractor “has paid in full or has otherwise satisfied all obligations for all materials and equipment furnished” by appellant. Appellant contends that the inclusion in the affidavit of the language “or has otherwise satisfied” appellant’s claims introduced an alternative method of compensation which was not contemplated by the statute and thus the affidavit fails to meet the requirements of OCGA § 44-14-361.2.

We do not agree. The general contractor’s language that he “has paid in full or has otherwise satisfied all obligations” constitutes a sworn statement that appellant was completely compensated for all work and services performed, labor, materials and equipment furnished. “[I]nasmuch as our lien laws and procedures are in derogation of the common law, they must be construed strictly against the creditor and in favor of the debtor. [Cit.]” Brockett Road Apts. v. Ga.Pacific Corp., 138 Ga. App. 198, 199 (225 SE2d 771) (1976). (Emphasis supplied.) See Cowart v. Reeves, 80 Ga. App. 161, 164 (55 SE2d 911) (1949). Construing OCGA § 44-14-361.2 (a) (2) (A) in favor of appellees-debtors, we find the general contractor’s affidavit in substantial if not complete compliance with the statute and affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong, P. J., and Carley, J., concur. *867 Decided May 28, 1985. Lamar Gibson, for appellant. Martin W. Foster, Michael D. Devane, for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

331 S.E.2d 889, 174 Ga. App. 866, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 1983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixie-concrete-services-inc-v-life-insurance-company-of-georgia-gactapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack