Dixie Auto Transport Co. v. Louttit

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dixie Auto Transport Co. v. Louttit

588 So. 2d 68, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11106, 1991 WL 224567

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 1991·No. No. 90-03667·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

HALL, Judge.

The appellants contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the appellee on the basis of collateral estoppel. The appellants argue the defensive use of collateral estoppel is inappropriate where there is no mutuality of parties. We disagree and affirm based on Zeidwig v. Ward, 548 So.2d 209 (Fla.1989), and Verhagen v. Arroyo, 552 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL, Judge.

The appellants contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the appellee on the basis of collateral estoppel. The appellants argue the defensive use of collateral estoppel is inappropriate where there is no mutuality of parties. We disagree and affirm based on Zeidwig v. Ward, 548 So.2d 209 (Fla.1989), and Verhagen v. Arroyo, 552 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Dixie Auto Transport Co. v. Louttit, 588 So. 2d 68, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11106, 1991 WL 224567 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

588 So. 2d 68 (Dixie Auto Transport Co. v. Louttit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related