Division 689, Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, A.F.L. v. Capital Transit Company

227 F.2d 19, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 4, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4539
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 9, 1955·No. 18-7139·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appeal is sought from an order of the District Court denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment or for judgment on the pleadings. We hold the order is not final for the purpose of appeal-ability.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Division 689, Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, A.F.L. v. Capital Transit Company, 227 F.2d 19, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 4, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4539 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

227 F.2d 19 (Division 689, Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, A.F.L. v. Capital Transit Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Wilson
District of Columbia, 2024
Brandon v. Hines
439 A.2d 496 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1981)
Heron v. City and County of Denver, Colorado
317 F.2d 309 (Tenth Circuit, 1963)
Heron v. City & County of Denver
317 F.2d 309 (Tenth Circuit, 1963)
Moyer v. Moyer
134 A.2d 649 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1957)
Ercona Camera Corporation v. Brownell
246 F.2d 675 (D.C. Circuit, 1957)
Ercona Camera Corp. v. Brownell
246 F.2d 675 (D.C. Circuit, 1957)
John Thompson Beacon Windows, Ltd. v. Ferro, Inc.
232 F.2d 366 (D.C. Circuit, 1956)