Distilled Brands, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Distilled Brands, Inc. v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 445

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 11, 1958

DocketNo. 62583; protests 320465-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 41 Cust. Ct. 445 (Distilled Brands, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Distilled Brands, Inc. v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 445 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Cust. Ct. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/distilled-brands-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1958.