Distilled Brands, Inc. v. United States
This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 457 (Distilled Brands, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[458]*458Opinion by
It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as-manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Cust. Ct. 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/distilled-brands-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1960.