Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson

Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson

93 Ohio St. 3d 1323
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 Ohio St. 3d 364 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 21, 2001·No. 01-1205·Published

Opinion

This matter is pending before the court upon the filing by respondent, Michael Troy Watson, on October 19, 2001, of a motion for stay of proceedings and demand for investigation. On October 25, 2001, relator filed a memo opposing motion for stay and a motion to strike demand for investigation. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to strike demand for investigation be, and hereby is, denied.

Douglas, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by this court that the motion for stay of proceedings and demand for investigation be, and hereby is, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1323 (Ohio 2001).

93 Ohio St. 3d 1323 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.