Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson

93 Ohio St. 3d 1277

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 8, 2001

Docket01-1205

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1277 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1277 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon consideration of respondent’s motion for reconsideration of the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, nunc pro tunc correction of the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and respondent’s Rule 58 request for findings by the court, request for findings on respondent’s motion to dismiss, motion to strike, and respondent’s renewed motion to dismiss and/or in the alternative, respondent’s motion for directed verdict (judgment notwithstanding the verdict) and other relief, request for findings on the respondent’s motions to dismiss, motion to strike, and respondent’s renewed motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, respondent’s motion for directed verdict and other relief,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions be, and hereby are, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of respondent’s motion for reconsideration of the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, nunc pro tunc correction of the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and respondent’s Rule 58 request for findings by the court, request for findings on respondent’s motion to dismiss, motion to strike, and respondent’s renewed motion to dismiss and/or in the alternative, respondent’s motion for directed verdict (judgment notwithstanding the verdict) and other relief, request for findings on the respondent’s motions to dismiss, motion to strike, and respondent’s renewed motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, respondent’s motion for directed verdict and other relief,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions be, and hereby are, denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. 3d 1277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-watson-ohio-2001.