Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire
This text of 868 N.E.2d 1280 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 05-087 This cause is scheduled for oral argument on July 10, 2007. On June 29, 2007, Nathaniel R. Jones filed a notice of appearance on behalf of respondent. On July 2, 2007, Jones filed a motion for continuance of oral argument and indicated that he had a prior scheduling conflict he was unable to resolve. However, assignments in the Supreme Court take precedence over other assignments. Accordingly, upon consideration of respondent’s motion for continuance of oral argument,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
868 N.E.2d 1280, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-squire-ohio-2007.