Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry

1998 Ohio 492, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1224

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 29, 1998

Docket1996-0525

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1998 Ohio 492 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry, 1998 Ohio 492, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1224 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 1224.]

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SCURRY. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry, 1998-Ohio-492.] (No. 96-525—Submitted and decided December 30, 1998.) ON APPLICATION FOR TERMINATION OF PROBATION. __________________ {¶ 1} On July 24, 1996, this court suspended respondent, Fred L. Scurry, for one year, stayed the suspension and placed respondent on probation for a period of two years. On December 2, 1998, respondent filed an application for termination of probation. {¶ 2} The court comes now to consider its order of July 24, 1996, and finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(9). {¶ 3} THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of Fred L. Scurry, Attorney Registration No. 0021256, last known business address in London, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 95, 666 N.E.2d 1089. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 1224.]

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SCURRY. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry, 1998-Ohio-492.] (No. 96-525—Submitted and decided December 30, 1998.) ON APPLICATION FOR TERMINATION OF PROBATION. __________________ {¶ 1} On July 24, 1996, this court suspended respondent, Fred L. Scurry, for one year, stayed the suspension and placed respondent on probation for a period of two years. On December 2, 1998, respondent filed an application for termination of probation. {¶ 2} The court comes now to consider its order of July 24, 1996, and finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(9). {¶ 3} THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of Fred L. Scurry, Attorney Registration No. 0021256, last known business address in London, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 95, 666 N.E.2d 1089. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 492, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-scurry-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack