Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry

666 N.E.2d 1089, 76 Ohio St. 3d 95
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 24, 1996
DocketNo. 96-525
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 666 N.E.2d 1089 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry, 666 N.E.2d 1089, 76 Ohio St. 3d 95 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court adopts the findings and recommendations of the board. Clearly, respondent’s alcoholism has caused him to neglect his duties to his clients and has adversely reflected on his fitness to practice law. However, we recognize, as did the board, that respondent has taken measures to resolve his problems.

Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the entire time stayed, provided that respondent adhere to the conditions of his two-year probation as set forth by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry
874 N.E.2d 521 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry
704 N.E.2d 254 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Gallagher
1998 Ohio 592 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gallagher
693 N.E.2d 1078 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
666 N.E.2d 1089, 76 Ohio St. 3d 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-scurry-ohio-1996.