Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson

2011 Ohio 5409, 130 Ohio St. 3d 1210
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 Ohio St. 3d 371
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 20, 2011·No. 2009-2267·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, David Jerome Robinson, Attorney Registration No. 0059369, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 25, 2010, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson, 126 Ohio St.3d 371, 2010-Ohio-3829, 933 N.E.2d 1095.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson, 2011 Ohio 5409, 130 Ohio St. 3d 1210 (Ohio 2011).

2011 Ohio 5409 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson
2010 Ohio 3829 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)