Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah

670 N.E.2d 479, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1404

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 8, 1996

Docket93-871

StatusPublished

This text of 670 N.E.2d 479 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah, 670 N.E.2d 479, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1404 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

On Application for Termination of Probation.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by respondent, Fuad B. Nasrallah, a.k.a. Fuad Bahige Nasrallah, of an application for termination of probation.

[1405]*1405The court coming now to consider its order of September 8, 1993, in which respondent was suspended from the practice of law for two years, with the suspension stayed and respondent placed on probation on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(9).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court, effective October 7, 1996, that the probation of Fuad B. Nasrallah, a.k.a. Fuad Bahige Nasrallah, Attorney Registration No. 0023893, last known business address in Dayton, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 238, 617 N.E.2d 677.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI