Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah

617 N.E.2d 677, 67 Ohio St. 3d 238
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 8, 1993
DocketNo. 93-871
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 617 N.E.2d 677 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah, 617 N.E.2d 677, 67 Ohio St. 3d 238 (Ohio 1993).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years, with the suspension stayed upon the conditions set forth in the stipulations and recommended sanction and restitution, and upon the further conditions recommended by the panel. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah
2002 Ohio 324 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nasrallah
761 N.E.2d 11 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
617 N.E.2d 677, 67 Ohio St. 3d 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-nasrallah-ohio-1993.