Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl

987 N.E.2d 699, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1442
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 Ohio St. 3d 71
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 2013·No. 2012-1719·Published

Opinion

This cause is pending before the court upon the filing of a report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this matter is remanded to the board for clarification of the board’s recommendation that purports to adopt the [1443]*1443panel’s findings of fact and misconduct, yet finds that respondent violated only Prof.Cond.R. 3.1 and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G), while the panel found that respondent violated Prof.Cond.R. 3.1, Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(d), Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(h), and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G).

Proceedings before this court in this case are stayed until further order of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl, 987 N.E.2d 699, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1442 (Ohio 2013).

987 N.E.2d 699 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.