Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl
This text of 987 N.E.2d 699 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause is pending before the court upon the filing of a report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this matter is remanded to the board for clarification of the board’s recommendation that purports to adopt the [1443]*1443panel’s findings of fact and misconduct, yet finds that respondent violated only Prof.Cond.R. 3.1 and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G), while the panel found that respondent violated Prof.Cond.R. 3.1, Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(d), Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(h), and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G).
Proceedings before this court in this case are stayed until further order of this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
987 N.E.2d 699, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-lehmkuhl-ohio-2013.