Disciplinary Counsel v. Conese
769 N.E.2d 872, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1490
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Conese. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 Ohio St. 3d 458 →
Opinion
Upon consideration of relator’s motion for continuance of oral argument scheduled for June 26, 2002,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for continuance of oral argument be, and hereby is, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Disciplinary Counsel v. Conese, 769 N.E.2d 872, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1490 (Ohio 2002).
769 N.E.2d 872 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Conese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.