Disciplinary Counsel v. Conese
769 N.E.2d 872, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1490
This text of 769 N.E.2d 872 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Conese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Disciplinary Counsel v. Conese, 769 N.E.2d 872, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1490 (Ohio 2002).
Opinion
Upon consideration of relator’s motion for continuance of oral argument scheduled for June 26, 2002,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for continuance of oral argument be, and hereby is, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
769 N.E.2d 872, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-conese-ohio-2002.