Disciplinary Board v. Stensland
This text of 2011 ND 110 (Disciplinary Board v. Stensland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 6/21/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2011 ND 106
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Ryan Douglas Zottnick, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20100111
Ryan Douglas Zottnick, Petitioner and Appellant
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20110069
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Pamela Ann Nesvig, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5518, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5518, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Susan Schmidt, 400 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 27, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Zottnick
Nos. 20100111 & 20110069
[¶1] Ryan Zottnick appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of simple assault-domestic violence (second offense or more) and from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Zottnick argues that there was insufficient evidence presented to convict him of the charge and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 ND 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-board-v-stensland-nd-2011.