Disciplinary Board v. Dyer
Opinion
Filed 6/7/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2012 ND 109
David L. Thorson, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20120002
Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for petitioner and appellant; on brief.
Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant State’s Attorney, 210 2nd Ave. NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for respondent and appellee; on brief.
Thorson v. State
[¶1] David L. Thorson appeals from the trial court’s order denying his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Thorson argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his counsel did not obtain a copy of the form 960 report and did not call the victim’s father and mother as witnesses. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2012 ND 118 (Disciplinary Board v. Dyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.