Diosdado v. Huntington Beach Union High School District
This text of Diosdado v. Huntington Beach Union High School District (Diosdado v. Huntington Beach Union High School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 11 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MONIQUE KRISTEN DIOSDADO, on No. 25-299 behalf of S. D., D.C. No. 8:24-cv-02490-FLA-KES Plaintiff - Appellant, MEMORANDUM* v.
HUNTINGTON BEACH UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2026**
Before: LEE, DESAI, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Monique Kristen Diosdado appeals pro se from the district court’s order
denying her motion to represent her minor child in this action. We review de novo.
Johns v. County of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 876 (9th Cir. 1997). We affirm the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s order denying Diosdado’s motion. See Grizzell v. San Elijo
Elementary Sch., 110 F.4th 1177, 1179-80 (9th Cir. 2024) (explaining that under
this circuit’s binding precedent, a non-attorney parent or guardian cannot bring an
action on behalf of a minor child without retaining a lawyer), cert. denied, 145 S.
Ct. 2701 (2025); see also Herrera v. City of Palmdale, 918 F.3d 1037, 1042 (9th
Cir. 2019) (a district court order may be considered final for purposes of appellate
jurisdiction where its result puts the appellant “effectively out of court”).
We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued
in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on
appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
All pending motions and requests are denied.
AFFIRMED.
2 25-299
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Diosdado v. Huntington Beach Union High School District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diosdado-v-huntington-beach-union-high-school-district-ca9-2026.