Dinkle v. Lagala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dinkle v. Lagala

246 A.D.2d 625, 667 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 620

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D.2d 625 (Dinkle v. Lagala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dinkle v. Lagala, 246 A.D.2d 625, 667 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Vincent Lagala and Giovanna Fontana appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), dated December 2, 1996, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the basis that they were not negligent as matter of law.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs to the appellants, in light of our decision and order in Dinkle v Lagala (246 AD2d 624 [decided herewith]).

This appeal is academic since in Dinkle v Lagala (246 AD2d 624, supra [decided herewith]) the complaint was dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants (see, Amana El. Corp. v Ydrohoos-Aquarius, Inc., 244 AD2d 371; Matter of Turner v New York City Hous. Auth., 243 AD2d 636). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Vincent Lagala and Giovanna Fontana appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), dated December 2, 1996, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the basis that they were not negligent as matter of law.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs to the appellants, in light of our decision and order in Dinkle v Lagala (246 AD2d 624 [decided herewith]).

This appeal is academic since in Dinkle v Lagala (246 AD2d 624, supra [decided herewith]) the complaint was dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants (see, Amana El. Corp. v Ydrohoos-Aquarius, Inc., 244 AD2d 371; Matter of Turner v New York City Hous. Auth., 243 AD2d 636). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D.2d 625, 667 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinkle-v-lagala-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack