Dillon v. Saul

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided May 21, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-00294·Unknown

Opinion

Cyrus Safa Attorney at Law: 13241 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562) 868-5886 Fax: (562) 868-8868 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Leonard Stone Attorney at Law: 5791 Shook & Stone, Chtd. 710 South 4th Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 Tel.: (702) 385-2220 Fax: (702) 384-0394 E-mail: LMoreno@shookandstone.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Shaun R. Dillon SHAUN R. DILLON, ) Case No.: 3:20-cv-00294-CLB ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ) THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF vs. ) ATTORNEY FEES AND ) EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE ANDREW SAUL, ) EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE Commissioner of Social Security, ) ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) ) Defendant. ) ) ) THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Shaun R. Dillon be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of three thousand nine hundred fourteen dollars ($3,914.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Shaun R. Dillon, the government will consider the matter of Shaun R. Dillon's assignment of EAJA fees to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing. The retainer agreement containing the assignment is attached as exhibit 1. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. Fees shall be made payable to Shaun R. Dillon, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Shaun R. Dillon does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees and expenses to be made directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment executed by Shaun R. Dillon.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to Lawrence D. Rohlfing.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Shaun R. Dillon's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Shaun 1 The parties do not stipulate whether counsel for the plaintiff has a cognizable lien under federal law against the recovery of EAJA fees that survives the Treasury /R. Dillon and/or Lawrence D. Rohlfing including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Cyrus Safa and/or the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA. DATE: May 19, 2021 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING /S/ Lawrence D, Rolfing BY: ? Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorney for plaintiff Shaun R. Dillon

1] DATE: May 19, 2021 CHRISTOPHER CHIOU D Acting United States Attorney /s/ Alison 9. Cheung ALLISON J. CHEUNG Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization) IT IS SO ORDERED: DATE: May 21, 2021 UNYWED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dillon v. Saul, (D. Nev. 2021).

Dillon v. Saul (Dillon v. Saul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)