Dillon v. Core Civic, Correction Corp of America (NSDC)
Opinion
Case No.: 2:20-cv-01436-JAD-VCF Melvin L. Dillon, et al.,
Plaintiffs Order Adopting Report & Recommendation v. [ECF No. 34] Core Civic, Correction Corp of America (NSDC), et al., Defendants In a June 18, 2021, report and recommendation, the magistrate judge ordered the plaintiffs to file a proper amended complaint by July 19, 2021, and he recommends that, if they fail to do so, this case be permitted to proceed only on a single injunctive-relief claim against defendants Koehn, Carvajal, and Jefferson to remedy an alleged deliberate indifference to unsafe conditions.1 The deadline for any party to object to that recommendation was July 2, 2021, and no party filed anything. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”2 Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 34] is ADOPTED. If plaintiffs fail to file a proper amended complaint that complies with my prior order [ECF No. 8] by July 19, 2021, this case will proceed 1 ECF No. 34 at 2. 2 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). 1 only on a single injunctive-relief claim against defendants Koehn, Carvajal, and Jefferson to remedy an alleged deliberate indifference to unsafe conditions. cone Dorsey Dated: July 12, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dillon v. Core Civic, Correction Corp of America (NSDC) (Dillon v. Core Civic, Correction Corp of America (NSDC)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.