Dillon v. Core Civic, Correction Corp of America (NSDC)

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** MELVIN L. DILLON and ROBERT J. DILLON, 7 Plaintiff, 8 2:20-cv-01436-JAD-VCF vs. ORDER 9 CORE CIVIC, CORRECTION CORP OF AMERICA (NSDC), et al., 10 Defendants. 11 Before the Court is the Motion for Reconsideration on Request of Time Extension to Serve 12 Complaint and Summons (ECF NO. 17). 13 On December 28, 2020, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend Time to Serve Complaint 14 and Summons because Plaintiffs failed to provide good cause as to why they have not been able to perfect 15 service of process on Defendants Michael Carvajal and Brian Koehn. (ECF No. 16). Plaintiffs now ask 16 the court to reconsider their request for extension of time to perfect service on Defendants Michael 17 Carvajal and Brian Koehn. (ECF NO. 17). 18 The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs’ motion and finds that Plaintiffs have provided good cause that 19 justify their request to extend the time to perfect service of process on Defendants Michael Carvajal and 20 Brian Koehn. See Fed. R.Civ. P. 4(m); Lemoge, 587 F.3d at 1198; Mann, 324 F.3d at 1090 (the court may 21 extend the deadline for service of process retroactively). 22 Accordingly, 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration on Request of Time Extension to 24 Serve Complaint and Summons (ECF NO. 17), is GRANTED. 25 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time to perfect service of process on Defendants Michael 2 || Carvajal and Brian Koehn is extended up to and including May 28, 2021. 3 DATED this 26th day of January, 2021. “ “P Z A - oo 4 CAM FERENBACH 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25