Dill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dill v. State

678 So. 2d 483, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8871, 1996 WL 465046

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 16, 1996

DocketNo. 96-1086

StatusPublished

This text of 678 So. 2d 483 (Dill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dill v. State, 678 So. 2d 483, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8871, 1996 WL 465046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences, but strike the imposition of the public defender’s fee because the record does not establish that appellant was advised of his right to contest the amount of the fee. See Allmond v. State, 668 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Although a separate final judgment for the fee advised appellant of the right to object within thirty days, the judgment does not show that a copy was.served on appellant. Andino v. State, 676 So.2d 493 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). On remand, the trial court may reconsider the imposition of the fee after compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1).

JUDGMENTS and SENTENCES AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE STRICKEN; REMANDED.

COBB, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences, but strike the imposition of the public defender’s fee because the record does not establish that appellant was advised of his right to contest the amount of the fee. See Allmond v. State, 668 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Although a separate final judgment for the fee advised appellant of the right to object within thirty days, the judgment does not show that a copy was.served on appellant. Andino v. State, 676 So.2d 493 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). On remand, the trial court may reconsider the imposition of the fee after compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1).

JUDGMENTS and SENTENCES AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE STRICKEN; REMANDED.

COBB, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

678 So. 2d 483, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8871, 1996 WL 465046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dill-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack