Dill v. State

678 So. 2d 483, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8871, 1996 WL 465046
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 1996·No. No. 96-1086·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences, but strike the imposition of the public defender’s fee because the record does not establish that appellant was advised of his right to contest the amount of the fee. See Allmond v. State, 668 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Although a separate final judgment for the fee advised appellant of the right to object within thirty days, the judgment does not show that a copy was.served on appellant. Andino v. State, 676 So.2d 493 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). On remand, the trial court may reconsider the imposition of the fee after compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1).

JUDGMENTS and SENTENCES AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE STRICKEN; REMANDED.

COBB, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dill v. State, 678 So. 2d 483, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8871, 1996 WL 465046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

678 So. 2d 483 (Dill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Allmond v. State
668 So. 2d 1120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Andino v. State
676 So. 2d 493 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)