Andino v. State
This text of 676 So. 2d 493 (Andino v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David Miranda ANDINO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and S.C. Van Voorhees, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.
HARRIS, Judge.
In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences imposed in each case, but strike the imposition of public defender's fees because the record does not establish that appellant was advised of his right to contest the amount of the fees. See Allmond v. State, 668 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Although a separate final judgment for the public defender's fees stated that appellant may contest the amount within 30 days, that judgment does not show that a copy was served on appellant. On remand, the trial court may reconsider the imposition of the fees after compliance with Rule 3.720(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
JUDGMENTS and SENTENCES AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER'S FEES STRICKEN; and REMANDED.
THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ. concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
676 So. 2d 493, 1996 WL 354600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andino-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.