Dilbeck v. Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc

CourtDistrict Court, D. New Jersey
DecidedJuly 16, 2019
Docket1:19-cv-15443
StatusUnknown

This text of Dilbeck v. Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc (Dilbeck v. Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dilbeck v. Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc, (D.N.J. 2019).

Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: VALSARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2875

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —8)

On February 14, 2019, the Panel transferred 5 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 363 F.Supp.3d 1378 (J.P.M.L. 2019). Since that time, 30 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of New Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Robert B. Kugler. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to Judge Kugler. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of New Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of February 14, 2019, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Robert B. Kugler. This order docs not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7- day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL: Inasmuch as no objection is a _ pending at this time, the Le. io BA . stay is lifted. Jul 16, 2019 John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel CLERK’S OFFICE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON “7 ka MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION var Paaahi □□ in my aff ice. □ BISTRIC ‘COURT _ .fui BF NEW JERSE, WiLL pM W “Jey CLF. of N aI C

SCHEDULE CTO-8 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 19--03344 Dilbeck v. Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc et al TENNESSEE EASTERN

TNE 4 19--00048 Rollins v. Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Valsartan N-Nitrosodimethylamine (Ndma) Contamination Prods. Liab. Litig.
363 F. Supp. 3d 1378 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dilbeck v. Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dilbeck-v-prinston-pharmaceutical-inc-njd-2019.