Diggs v. Louisville & N. R. Co.
159 F. 1027
This text of 159 F. 1027 (Diggs v. Louisville & N. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Diggs v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 159 F. 1027 (6th Cir. 1907).
Opinion
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee. Pickle, Turner & Kennerly and Black & Black, for plaintiffs in error. Cornick, Wright & Frantz and James G. Johnson, for defendants in error. No opinion. Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See 158 Fed. 97.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Diggs v. Louisville & N. R. Co.
158 F. 97 (Sixth Circuit, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
159 F. 1027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diggs-v-louisville-n-r-co-ca6-1907.