DiGeronimo v. First Nationwide Bank

209 A.D.2d 575, 619 N.Y.S.2d 640, 5 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 199, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11527
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 21, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 209 A.D.2d 575 (DiGeronimo v. First Nationwide Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DiGeronimo v. First Nationwide Bank, 209 A.D.2d 575, 619 N.Y.S.2d 640, 5 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 199, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful dismissal, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated October 1, 1992, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

Executive Law § 296 permits the dismissal of an employee who happens to have a disability when the disabling condition prevents the employee from reasonably performing his job (see, Matter of Antonsen v Ward, 77 NY2d 506; Matter of Miller v Ravitch, 60 NY2d 527; Matter of Obas v Kiley, 149 AD2d 422). Here, because of a non-job related automobile accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries which he concedes often rendered him totally unable to perform his work. Under [576]*576these circumstances, the defendant was permitted to dismiss him based on his excessive absences and unsatisfactory performance.

Since the plaintiff failed to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact which would require a trial of the action (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557), the Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fama v. American International Group, Inc.
306 A.D.2d 310 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Lawson v. High Bar Wholesale Food Distributors, Inc.
217 A.D.2d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D.2d 575, 619 N.Y.S.2d 640, 5 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 199, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/digeronimo-v-first-nationwide-bank-nyappdiv-1994.