Dietrich v. Rumsey
40 Ill. 50
Opinion
The record shows a judgment rendered on the 13th day of the month, while the condition of the appeal bond recites a judgment’ rendered on the 14th day of the same month. This misdescription of the judgment appealed from is fatal. A rule nisi will be entered, requiring the appellant to file a sufficient appeal bond, or, in default thereof, the appeal will be dismissed.
The bond does not recite that there was a judgment of retorno in the court below; it had better be amended also in that regard.
Mule nisi.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dietrich v. Rumsey, 40 Ill. 50 (Ill. 1867).
40 Ill. 50 (Dietrich v. Rumsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Damron v. Texas & St. Louis R. R.
1 White & W. 163 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)