Dietrich v. Rumsey

40 Ill. 50
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The record shows a judgment rendered on the 13th day of the month, while the condition of the appeal bond recites a judgment’ rendered on the 14th day of the same month. This misdescription of the judgment appealed from is fatal. A rule nisi will be entered, requiring the appellant to file a sufficient appeal bond, or, in default thereof, the appeal will be dismissed.

The bond does not recite that there was a judgment of retorno in the court below; it had better be amended also in that regard.

Mule nisi.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dietrich v. Rumsey, 40 Ill. 50 (Ill. 1867).

40 Ill. 50 (Dietrich v. Rumsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Damron v. Texas & St. Louis R. R.
1 White & W. 163 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)