Dietrich v. Rumsey

Illinois Supreme Court

Dietrich v. Rumsey

40 Ill. 50

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1867

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 Ill. 50 (Dietrich v. Rumsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dietrich v. Rumsey, 40 Ill. 50 (Ill. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The record shows a judgment rendered on the 13th day of the month, while the condition of the appeal bond recites a judgment’ rendered on the 14th day of the same month. This misdescription of the judgment appealed from is fatal. A rule nisi will be entered, requiring the appellant to file a sufficient appeal bond, or, in default thereof, the appeal will be dismissed.

The bond does not recite that there was a judgment of retorno in the court below; it had better be amended also in that regard.

Mule nisi.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The record shows a judgment rendered on the 13th day of the month, while the condition of the appeal bond recites a judgment’ rendered on the 14th day of the same month. This misdescription of the judgment appealed from is fatal. A rule nisi will be entered, requiring the appellant to file a sufficient appeal bond, or, in default thereof, the appeal will be dismissed.

The bond does not recite that there was a judgment of retorno in the court below; it had better be amended also in that regard.

Mule nisi.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Ill. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dietrich-v-rumsey-ill-1867.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack