Dickey v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Dickey v. Boston & Maine Railroad

47 A. 79, 70 N.H. 34

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedDecember 5, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 47 A. 79 (Dickey v. Boston & Maine Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dickey v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 47 A. 79, 70 N.H. 34 (N.H. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Chase, J.

It was the duty of the defendants to keep the highway crossing in a -reasonably safe and convenient condition for public use. P. S., c. 159, s. 1; Concord v. Railroad, 69 N. H. 87. Whether it should have been covered with snow to put it into such condition is a question of fact. Boothby v. Railway, 66 N. H. 342.

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase, J.

It was the duty of the defendants to keep the highway crossing in a -reasonably safe and convenient condition for public use. P. S., c. 159, s. 1; Concord v. Railroad, 69 N. H. 87. Whether it should have been covered with snow to put it into such condition is a question of fact. Boothby v. Railway, 66 N. H. 342.

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A. 79, 70 N.H. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickey-v-boston-maine-railroad-nh-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack