Dickey v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Dickey v. Boston & Maine Railroad

47 A. 79, 70 N.H. 34

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1899·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Chase, J.

It was the duty of the defendants to keep the highway crossing in a -reasonably safe and convenient condition for public use. P. S., c. 159, s. 1; Concord v. Railroad, 69 N. H. 87. Whether it should have been covered with snow to put it into such condition is a question of fact. Boothby v. Railway, 66 N. H. 342.

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase, J.

It was the duty of the defendants to keep the highway crossing in a -reasonably safe and convenient condition for public use. P. S., c. 159, s. 1; Concord v. Railroad, 69 N. H. 87. Whether it should have been covered with snow to put it into such condition is a question of fact. Boothby v. Railway, 66 N. H. 342.

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Dickey v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 47 A. 79, 70 N.H. 34 (N.H. 1899).

Pincite

47 A. 79 (Dickey v. Boston & Maine Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related