Concord v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Concord v. Boston & Maine Railroad

38 A. 378, 69 N.H. 87

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedDecember 5, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 38 A. 378 (Concord v. Boston & Maine Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Concord v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 38 A. 378, 69 N.H. 87 (N.H. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Carpenter, C. J.

“ It shall be the duty of the proprietors of every railroad to provide suitable crossings ... for the accommodation of the public.” P. S., c. 159, s. 1. The bridge is a crossing. Until it is made reasonably safe and convenient for the public use it is not suitable. It being agreed that the public safety requires the bridge to be lighted, there must be

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carpenter, C. J.

“ It shall be the duty of the proprietors of every railroad to provide suitable crossings ... for the accommodation of the public.” P. S., c. 159, s. 1. The bridge is a crossing. Until it is made reasonably safe and convenient for the public use it is not suitable. It being agreed that the public safety requires the bridge to be lighted, there must be

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A. 378, 69 N.H. 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/concord-v-boston-maine-railroad-nh-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack