Dickerson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Dickerson v. State

200 S.W.3d 899, 360 Ark. 305

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJanuary 13, 2005

DocketCR 04-1320

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 S.W.3d 899 (Dickerson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dickerson v. State, 200 S.W.3d 899, 360 Ark. 305 (Ark. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

John Joplin, a full-time, state-salaried public defender in Sebastian County, was appointed by the trial court to represent Appellant Arthur Dickerson, a/k/a Bolden, an indigent defendant, on the charge of first-degree murder. Following a trial, he was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. Joplin timely filed a notice of appeal and has timely lodged the record in this court.

Joplin now moves to withdraw as counsel on appeal, based on this court’s case of Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000), which held that full-time, state-salaried public defenders were ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal. Since, Rushing, the General Assembly has passed legislation providing that only those full-time, state-salaried public defenders who do not have state-funded secretaries may seek compensation for their work on appeal. See Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Supp. 2003).

Joplin states in his motion that he is provided with a full-time, state-funded secretary to engage in his day-to-day office operations. Accordingly, he would not be eligible for compensation for appellate work, and we grant his motion to withdraw. It is not necessary for us to appoint substitute counsel at this time, as Ben Beland is the attorney of record for this appeal, and he has not filed a motion to withdraw. Appellant’s pro se motion for appointment of counsel is therefore moot.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

John Joplin, a full-time, state-salaried public defender in Sebastian County, was appointed by the trial court to represent Appellant Arthur Dickerson, a/k/a Bolden, an indigent defendant, on the charge of first-degree murder. Following a trial, he was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. Joplin timely filed a notice of appeal and has timely lodged the record in this court.

Joplin now moves to withdraw as counsel on appeal, based on this court’s case of Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000), which held that full-time, state-salaried public defenders were ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal. Since, Rushing, the General Assembly has passed legislation providing that only those full-time, state-salaried public defenders who do not have state-funded secretaries may seek compensation for their work on appeal. See Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Supp. 2003).

Joplin states in his motion that he is provided with a full-time, state-funded secretary to engage in his day-to-day office operations. Accordingly, he would not be eligible for compensation for appellate work, and we grant his motion to withdraw. It is not necessary for us to appoint substitute counsel at this time, as Ben Beland is the attorney of record for this appeal, and he has not filed a motion to withdraw. Appellant’s pro se motion for appointment of counsel is therefore moot.

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 S.W.3d 899, 360 Ark. 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dickerson-v-state-ark-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack