Dick v. Phillips

205 So. 2d 766, 1967 La. App. LEXIS 4916
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 29, 1967
DocketNo. 2215
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 205 So. 2d 766 (Dick v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dick v. Phillips, 205 So. 2d 766, 1967 La. App. LEXIS 4916 (La. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

LEAR, Judge.

Plaintiff alleges damages for personal injuries and certain special losses occa[767]*767sioned him by reason of an automobile accident occurring on Interstate Highway 10 in June, 1964.

He sets forth that he was proceeding in his own proper left lane of eastbound traffic, when suddenly and without warning a vehicle owned and operated by Lynch Phillips, insured by defendant Southwestern Fire Insurance Company, swerved into plaintiff’s lane of traffic causing the damages and injuries complained of. Plaintiff sought and obtained a trial by jury.

The defendant Phillips admits the accident, but invokes the doctrine of sudden emergency to release him from liability. A plea of contributory negligence was made and the issues were thus presented to the jury.

The jury, by vote of nine to three, rendered verdict for defendants, and plaintiff prosecuted this appeal.

Plaintiff’s entire objection to the verdict of the jury is directed to their finding of facts. Nowhere in plaintiff’s brief does he object to any charge given the jury by the trial judge, nor does he object to any requested but refused charge. Thus, he comes to this court asking a reversal of the jury’s finding of fact.

This court has studied the instructions as given by the district court and finds them to be complete and correct in every respect. We find no manifest error in the verdict of the jury. Ferguson v. Belcher & Son, 230 La. 422, 88 So.2d 806; Second Church of Christ, Scientist v. Spencer, 230 La. 432, 88 So.2d 810; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La. 959, 200 So.2d 127 (S.Ct.1967).

For the reasons above assigned, the judgment of the district court is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dick v. Phillips
218 So. 2d 299 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 So. 2d 766, 1967 La. App. LEXIS 4916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dick-v-phillips-lactapp-1967.