Dick v. Jindal

38 So. 3d 345, 2010 La. LEXIS 1609
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 25, 2010·No. No. 2010-C-0971·Published

Opinion

In re Allen, Earnest Michael; Anderson, Melvin; Bailey, Curtis; Baker, Dwayne; Bedford, Draper; Brumfield, Jimmy; Buckner, Sterling; Caston, Frank; Ca-ston, Sonny; Cho, Ju Hyun; Davis, Frederick Domino; De Salvo, Carlo; Dick, Wesley; Dilosa, Kennth; Ford, Larry; Ford, Terrence; Fradella, Frank; Fradel-la, Frank; Goodwin, Leslie; Hall Sr., Lawrence; Harris, Darron; Hayes, Rudolph; Isaac, Milton; Jefferson, Elton; Lynch, Clyde; Magee, Daniel; Meyers, Kim; Mills, Kenny; Neidhart, Gayle; Overby, William; Parent, Craig; Pendleton, James; Perkins, Malcolm; Poole, Don; Richard, Joseph; Robinson, Prentice; Scott, Edmond; Skinner, Lakyia; Temple, Kennan; Turner, Kendrick; Tyler, Floyd; Weber, George; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 567,386; to the [346]*346Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 1667.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dick v. Jindal, 38 So. 3d 345, 2010 La. LEXIS 1609 (La. 2010).

38 So. 3d 345 (Dick v. Jindal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.