Dick v. Jindal
This text of 38 So. 3d 345 (Dick v. Jindal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Allen, Earnest Michael; Anderson, Melvin; Bailey, Curtis; Baker, Dwayne; Bedford, Draper; Brumfield, Jimmy; Buckner, Sterling; Caston, Frank; Ca-ston, Sonny; Cho, Ju Hyun; Davis, Frederick Domino; De Salvo, Carlo; Dick, Wesley; Dilosa, Kennth; Ford, Larry; Ford, Terrence; Fradella, Frank; Fradel-la, Frank; Goodwin, Leslie; Hall Sr., Lawrence; Harris, Darron; Hayes, Rudolph; Isaac, Milton; Jefferson, Elton; Lynch, Clyde; Magee, Daniel; Meyers, Kim; Mills, Kenny; Neidhart, Gayle; Overby, William; Parent, Craig; Pendleton, James; Perkins, Malcolm; Poole, Don; Richard, Joseph; Robinson, Prentice; Scott, Edmond; Skinner, Lakyia; Temple, Kennan; Turner, Kendrick; Tyler, Floyd; Weber, George; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 567,386; to the [346]*346Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 1667.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 So. 3d 345, 2010 La. LEXIS 1609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dick-v-jindal-la-2010.