Dicenzo v. New York Shovel & Crane Corp.
126 N.E.2d 309, 308 N.Y. 871
This text of 126 N.E.2d 309 (Dicenzo v. New York Shovel & Crane Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dicenzo v. New York Shovel & Crane Corp., 126 N.E.2d 309, 308 N.Y. 871 (N.Y. 1955).
Opinion
Sam Dicenzo, as Administrator of The Estate of Albert Dicenzo, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
New York Shovel & Crane Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Arthur Karger, Milton Boxer and Harry H. Lipsig for appellant.
Samuel Gottesman and Harold H. Wolgel for respondent.
Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ. Taking no part: FULD, J.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Costa v. Piermont Plaza Realty, Inc.
10 A.D.3d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Parisi v. Loewen Development Corp.
5 A.D.3d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Zafputo v. New Life Community Church
161 A.D.2d 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Carinha v. Action Crane Corp.
58 A.D.2d 261 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Stone v. Bigley Bros.
127 N.E.2d 913 (New York Court of Appeals, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
126 N.E.2d 309, 308 N.Y. 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dicenzo-v-new-york-shovel-crane-corp-ny-1955.