Diaz v. State

84 So. 3d 1144, 2012 WL 1020026, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4778
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Diaz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8794
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 2012·No. No. 3D12-436·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Adams v. State, 76 So.3d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional); see also Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138, 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (citing State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) [review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla. 2011) ], and acknowledging “uncertainty caused by Shelton [v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011) ]” but reaffirming its view that section 893.13 is constitutional).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. State, 84 So. 3d 1144, 2012 WL 1020026, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4778 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

84 So. 3d 1144 (Diaz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flagg v. State
74 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Little v. State
77 So. 3d 722 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Adams v. State
76 So. 3d 367 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
71 So. 3d 184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
802 F. Supp. 2d 1289 (M.D. Florida, 2011)