Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Diaz v. State

Diaz v. State

638 So. 2d 1059, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6502, 1994 WL 284614
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Diaz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 600 So. 2d 529 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 1994·No. No. 94-1603·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We treat appellant’s appeal from the April 21, 1994, order denying his motion for sanctions or clarifications as an appeal of the February 24, 1994, order denying his rule 3.800(a) motion. We conclude that the motion to correct sentence, seeking credit for [1060]*1060additional time served, is without merit, and therefore affirm.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. State, 638 So. 2d 1059, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6502, 1994 WL 284614 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

638 So. 2d 1059 (Diaz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.