Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Diaz v. State

Diaz v. State

608 So. 2d 550, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12026, 1992 WL 336111
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Diaz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 600 So. 2d 529 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 1992·No. No. 92-0736·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a juvenile, plead guilty to a charge of robbery and was sentenced as an adult over his objection. Because the sentencing order failed to include a specific finding of fact on criterion 4 of section [551]*55139.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes 1991, we must vacate the sentence and remand for resen-tencing. Kohler v. State, 588 So.2d 689 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); West v. State, 503 So.2d 435 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

DELL and FARMER, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. State, 608 So. 2d 550, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12026, 1992 WL 336111 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

608 So. 2d 550 (Diaz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kohler v. State
588 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
West v. State
503 So. 2d 435 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)