Diaz v. Housing Authority

755 A.2d 214, 253 Conn. 917, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 206
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 19, 2000·No. SC 16324·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 913 (AC 19214), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether an employee’s discharge for not returning to work, while claiming she was unable to do so because of a compensable injury within two days of her discharge, constitutes a prima facie violation of General Statutes § 31-290a, requiring the employer to show a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the discharge pursuant to Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc., 216 Conn. 40, 578 A.2d 1054 (1990)?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. Housing Authority, 755 A.2d 214, 253 Conn. 917, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 206 (Colo. 2000).

755 A.2d 214 (Diaz v. Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diaz v. Housing Authority
785 A.2d 192 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)