Diaz v. Department of Children and Families
This text of 4 So. 3d 700 (Diaz v. Department of Children and Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ruben Diaz seeks mandamus relief to compel the circuit court to rule on his pending petition for writ of mandamus, by which he seeks enforcement of an earlier order in a dependency matter. In response to an order to show cause, the Department of Children and Families shows that it has brought the pending petition to the attention of the circuit court, which has conducted a hearing on the matter, has directed the Department to investigate certain unresolved factual issues relating thereto, and has scheduled additional proceedings.
Given the actions taken by the circuit court, we conclude that the granting of mandamus relief is unwarranted at this point. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. Nonetheless, particularly since the proceedings below involve the welfare and interests of children, we encourage the circuit court to continue to act in a manner that will allow the expeditious resolution of the matter pending below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 So. 3d 700, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1295, 2009 WL 400375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-v-department-of-children-and-families-fladistctapp-2009.