Dias v. Phillips

59 Cal. 293
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1881
DocketNo. 7,478
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 59 Cal. 293 (Dias v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dias v. Phillips, 59 Cal. 293 (Cal. 1881).

Opinion

By Court:

Plaintiff brings this suit in his individual right, and also in his representative capacity, as executor. A demurrer to the complaint was filed, on behalf of defendant, and was overruled by the Court.

The question was raised by the demurrer whether the suit was properly brought by the plaintiff in a double capacity, and we think the objection to the complaint should have been sustained. The right of action was in him or in the estate, and not in both.

The judgment is that the plaintiffs I. L. Dias and I. L. Dias, as executor of the last will and testament of A. H. L. Dias, deceased, do recover, etc. We think the judgment can not be sustained.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. American National Bank
74 P.2d 1051 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)
Sando v. Roberts
156 N.W. 64 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1916)
Rogers v. Schlotterback
138 P. 728 (California Supreme Court, 1914)
Robertson v. Burrell
42 P. 1086 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
Redfield v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.
42 P. 822 (California Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 Cal. 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dias-v-phillips-cal-1881.